Ex parte GATES - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 19         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte PETER C. GATES                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-1731                                 
                              Application No. 08/377,924                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 7, 9              
          through 16, 18, 19, and 39 through 44.  These claims                        
          constitute all of the claims remaining in the application.                  


               Appellant’s invention pertains to an extrusion die                     
          apparatus.  A basic understanding of the invention can be                   
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 39, a copy of which               
          appears in  “APPENDIX A” of the brief (Paper No. 13).                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007