Appeal No. 1997-1731
Application No. 08/377,924
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Siard 4,472,129 Sep. 18, 1984
Briggs et al 4,522,775 Jun. 11, 1985
(Briggs ‘775)
Briggs et al 4,798,526 Jan. 17, 1989
(Briggs ‘526)
Teutsch 5,069,612 Dec. 3, 1991
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 7, 9 through 16, 18, 19, and 39 through 44 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Siard or Briggs ‘526 in view of Teutsch and Briggs ‘775.
The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer
(Paper No. 14), while the complete statement of appellant’s
argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 13).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007