The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GLEN S. BURKE and GAIL ZACHARIAS ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2467 Application No. 08/509,753 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-4 and 11-18. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to computer programming language constructs. Many computer languages used to develop programs are static languages. Programs written in such languages cannot be modified without recompilation. Dynamic languages, in contrast, allow certain actions to bePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007