Ex Parte NICOLAS et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not          
          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                               Paper No. 29           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                              Ex parte EDGARD NICOLAS,                                
                                     LUC BOTTE,                                       
                                  FRANCESCO POSAR,                                    
                                 and STEFANO BIGINI                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2936                                  
                             Application No. 08/360,335                               
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD: SEPTEMBER 13, 2001                               
                                    ____________                                      
          Before GARRIS, DELMENDO, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                     
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-9, which are all of the claims pending in             
          this application.                                                           
               We reverse.                                                            
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention is represented by claim 1, reproduced            
          below:                                                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007