Appeal No. 1997-3152 Page 15 Application No. 08/116,305 of claims 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is therefore reversed. Turning next to the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as claim 6 depends from claim 3, and the additional reference to Nagaraj does not overcome the deficiencies of Nakayama, Chu, Atobe and Ohno, the rejection of claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is therefore reversed. Turning next to the rejection of claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as claim 7 depends from claim 3, and the additional references to Nishi or Takahashi do not overcome the deficiencies of Nakayama, Chu, Atobe and Ohno, the rejection of claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is therefore reversed. Turning next to the rejection of claims 11-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as claims 11-13 depend from claim 8, and the additional reference to Shiozaki does not overcome the deficiencies of Nakayama, Chu, and Atobe, the rejection of claims 11-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is therefore reversed. Turning next to the rejection of claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, as claim 16 depends from claim 1, and the additional reference to Itou does not overcome the deficiencies ofPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007