The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte JOHANN G. SCHULZ and ENGELINA POROWSKI
_______________
Appeal No. 1997-3337
Application 08/189,899
_______________
HEARD: November 28, 2000
_______________
Before, WARREN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-5, 8-12, 14-17, 19, 22-28 and 30-
32, all the claims in the application. We have jurisdiction
under 35 U.S.C. § 134.1
Claims 6, 7, 13, 18, 20, 21 and 29 have been canceled by appellants1
in an after final amendment filed December 13, 1995. The after final
amendment has been entered by the examiner. (Examiner Answer, page 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007