Ex parte SCHULZ et al. - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1997-3337                                                          
          Application No. 08/189,899                                                    
          presence of a catalyst and heating the solution.  (Examiner’s                 
          answer, page 4, lines 16-17).                                                 
               The Examiner applies Muller ‘027 and ‘881 for the                        
          teaching the heating of an aqueous slurry containing sugar in                 
          the presence of an acid catalyst.  (Examiner’s answer,                        
          sentence bridging pages 4 and 5).  The Examiner finds that                    
          Waniczek discloses ketones and alcohols are conventional                      
          solubilizers for nitrated sugar ether reaction products.                      
          (Examiner’s answer, page 5, lines 5-8).  From these findings                  
          the Examiner concludes:                                                       
                    Having the prior art before him it would have                       
               been obvious to the artisan in the art with the                          
               Muller references teachings to have prepared the                         
               sugar of Stiff as an aqueous sugar solution prior to                     
               reacting with the oxirane because the sugar                              
               solutions are conventional forms of the sugar for a                      
               further reaction process.  Also, it is conventional                      
               known in the chemical art to prepare reaction                            
               compounds with conventional solvents, water, or                          
               Waniczek's alcohol or ketone for ease of reactions                       
               and to remove heat during reactions. The heating                         
               temperatures and pressures claimed by appellant fall                     
               within room temperatures and are rendered prima                          
               facie obvious with Stiff elevated temperatures,                          
               pressures above atmospheric, and the mild reaction                       
               conditions set forth at the top of page 3 of its                         
               specification.  (Examiner’s answer, page 5, lines                        
               10-22).                                                                  
               The Examiner has not presented convincing evidence or                    
          reasoning, nor pointed to evidence in the cited references                    

                                           5                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007