Ex Parte ISHIKAWA et al - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                                Paper No. 33         


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                    
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                     ____________                                    
                             Ex parte TAKATOSHI ISHIKAWA,                            
                                  TETSURO KOJIMA, and                                
                                   MASARU YOSHIKAWA                                  
                                     ____________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 1997-3361                                
                              Application No. 08/554,939                             
                                     ____________                                    
                               HEARD: January 24, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                    


         Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent           
         Judges.                                                                     
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
         the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 7 through 10, 16                  
         through 18, 20, 21, and 23, which are all the claims pending in             
         the subject application.  Subsequent to the final Office action,            
         the appellants filed two separate amendments on January 9, 1997             
         and April 9, 1997 amending claims 1 and 16 and canceling claims             
         6, 19, and 22.  (Papers 12 and 16.)  The examiner indicated that            








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007