The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAVINDRA L. ARUDI and RAMESH C. KUMAR
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3544
Application No. 08/404,234
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 23 and 44
through 47. Claims 24 through 43 are the only other claims
pending in this application and stand withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner as being directed to a
nonelected invention (Brief,
page 3; Answer, page 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007