Ex parte SATO et al. - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and           
                                                  is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                                          Paper No. 28              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                    Ex parte TOSHIYUKI SATO AND SHINYA KATAYAMA                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                                       Appeal No. 1997-3767                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/443,556                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                                             ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                           ____________                                                             

               Before GARRIS, PAK, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   




                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims             

               11-15, which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                      















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007