Ex parte CLARKE et al. - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and        
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                                      Paper No. 17              

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                          ____________                                                          

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                          

                                    Ex parte DAVID CLARKE AND PAUL L. R. STANLEY                                                
                                                          ____________                                                          

                                                      Appeal No. 1997-3781                                                      
                                                   Application No. 08/275,204                                                   
                                                          ____________                                                          

                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                          

               Before GARRIS, PAK, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          

                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims          

               2-9 and 11.  Claim 10, the only other pending claim, was withdrawn pursuant to a restriction                     

               requirement.                                                                                                     













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007