The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte ISRAEL BEINGLASS, MAHALINGAM VENKATESAN
and CHRISTIAN M. GRONET
_______________
Appeal No. 1997-4027
Application 08/300,111
_______________
HEARD: February 6, 2001
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
1, 3, 10 and 11. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.1
Claims 4-9 have been withdrawn from consideration as drawn to a non-elected invention. (See1
paper no. 8, mailed November 10, 1993). Claim 3 on appeal was amended by an after final amendment,
paper no. 28, filed August 26, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007