The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FUMIHIRO NAGASAWA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-4034 Application No. 08/260,269 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before KRASS, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellant's invention relates to a video signal recording apparatus in which the read control signal for reading the video signal stored in memory is synchronized with a timing 1 We observe that on September 29, 2000 (paper no. 23), appellant filed a waiver of the oral hearing set for November 15, 2000.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007