Appeal No. 1997-4138 Application No. 08/384,681 predetermined concentration of at least about 15 micrograms per ml in liquid form. The examiner has rejected claims 56 - 61 over Fish in combination with Gordon or Towbin and if necessary in view of Wada. (Answer, page 3). The examiner relies on Gordon as disclosing "direct application of antigens, immunoglobulins or both to microporous solid supports in any suitable preselected geometry, e.g., in the form of dots (page 11, line 5) or in a 3x3 mm grid pre-printed on the support (page 18, line 11)." (Answer, page 7). The examiner relies on Towbin as describing "direct dot/spot application of the dots to a defined location and the subsequent cutting of strips of desired geometry." (Id.) The examiner concludes (Answer, paragraph bridging pages 7-8): It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the methods, devices and kits of Fish by utilizing direct application of receptors in any suitable preselected geometry, such as within a "grid" work as suggested by either Gordon or Towbin for the same intended purpose of easy application to define locations, etc. However, claim 56 requires more than just a grid work to provide a preselected geometry for placement of the reagents. Claim 56 requires that the device consist essentially of an inert, opaque plastic carrier having a flat hydrophobic surface that is non- absorbent to said antibodies, antigens, haptens, and enzymes. In addition, the plastic carrier has deposited directly thereon an insolubilized specific binding partner in the form of spots of from 1 to 4 mm in diameter in discrete, visually locatable locations. Thus, in order to arrive at the claimed invention, Fish would have to be modified by depositing the 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007