The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SCOTT W. HARDEN and DAVID R. HARDEN ____________ Appeal No. 1997-4200 Application No. 08/428,790 ____________ HEARD: January 24, 2001 ____________ Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 15. Claims 9 through 14, which are the only other claims1 remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from further Although appealed claim 15 was omitted from the statement of rejection1 in the final Office action (Paper 14), the appellants and the examiner agree that the claim should be treated as finally rejected. (Appeal Brief, page 2; Examiner’s Answer, page 2.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007