Ex parte HARDEN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-4200                                                        
          Application No. 08/428,790                                                  


               thermoplastic of the adjacent conductor while                          
               retaining tack.                                                        
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for                   
          making high frequency cable comprising the recited steps.                   
          According to the appellants, the claimed method includes                    
          concentrically forming insulation on two separate electrical                
          wires (conductors) and joining the insulated conductors                     
          together in a manner which maintains the concentricity of each              
          electrical conductor with respect to the insulation.  (Appeal               
          brief, page 2.)                                                             
               The examiner relies upon the following prior art                       
          references as evidence of unpatentability:                                  
          Wermine                       2,204,782                Jun. 18,             
          1940                                                                        
          Bullock et al. (Bullock)           5,334,271                Aug.            
          02, 1994                                                                    
                                                  (filed Oct. 5, 1992)                
               Claims 1 through 8 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103 as unpatentable over Bullock in view of Wermine.                        
          (Examiner’s answer, pages 4-5.)                                             
               We have reviewed the entire record, including all of the               
          arguments and evidence presented by both the examiner and the               
          appellants in support of their respective positions.  This                  

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007