Appeal No. 1997-4243 Application 08/275,607 The claimed invention is directed to a large size plant stand which has a drainage control means hidden in the base thereof. The claimed invention may be further understood with reference to the appealed claims appended to appellant's brief. The references of record relied upon by the examiner as evidence of anticipation and obviousness are: Myers 540,681 June 11, 1895 Gloede 1,190,147 July 4, 1916 Niemczewski 1,451,515 Apr. 10, 1923 George 1,487,231 Mar. 18, 1924 Helton 5,062,239 Nov. 5, 1991 THE REJECTIONS Claims 8, 9, 10, 21, 22, 30, and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by George. According to the examiner, George teaches a flowerpot holder having a tray means 4, a drainage removal means and middle portion 5, a storage means 3, and a decoration means 1 with access means door at 2. It is the examiner's finding that George clearly anticipates these claims. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007