Appeal No. 1997-4243
Application 08/275,607
device to have a drainage storage means at all times.
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claim 33 and the
rejections of the claims dependent therefrom.
With respect to claim 13, we are of the view that
George does not anticipate this claimed subject matter.
George fails to disclose any room furnishings. We are in
agreement with appellant that claim 13 is directed to the
combination of such furnishings and a flowerpot. While George
does have the structure of the flowerpot in the claim, to
anticipate claim 13, a showing of room furnishings must be
included. The rejections of claim 13 and the claims dependent
therefrom are reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) APPEALS
AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
INTERFERENCES
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007