The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ANANTHACHARI SRINIVASAN, LEON R. LYLE,
and RAGHAVEN RAJAGOPALAN
__________
Appeal No. 1997-4379
Application No. 08/278,437
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, SCHEINER, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 14 through 18. Claims 6 through 13 and 19 through
26, which are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from
further consideration by the examiner as directed to a non-elected invention (office
action entered August 21, 1995, Paper No. 4, page 2).
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced in
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007