Appeal No. 1997-4379
Application No. 08/278,437
If, upon further review, the examiner believes that the rejection over the
combined disclosures of Dean, Edwards and Jost is still appropriate, the examiner may
reinstate the rejection. In doing so, the examiner must follow the established Office
procedures and afford appellants an opportunity to respond to the rejection.
Conclusion
The examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is reversed. The
examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is vacated.
REVERSED
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
TONI R. SCHEINER )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
DONALD E. ADAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007