Appeal No. 1998-0091 Application No. 08/404,054 Appellants contend that the evidence relied on by the examiner fails to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. (a) Claims 3 and 5 Bell discloses various embodiments of capacitive pressure transducers, of which the examiner relies on the Figure 3 embodiment. This embodiment includes nonconductive disks 2 and 4 made from a zero hysteresis, nonconductive or electrically insulative elastic material such as alumina, fused silica, or a glass such as Pyrex (col. 5, lines 33-36) and whose facing surfaces have applied thereto respective conductive layers 6 and 8. These components are assembled with a glass frit or ceramic sealing material 32 forming a gap between the electrodes, after which the assembly is fired, causing the glass frit to fuse the components together (col. 5, lines 12- 25). Although not mentioned by the examiner or appellants, Bell explains that high overload pressures can cause the electrodes to come into contact with each other. See Bell's column 10, lines 13-17 ("the thickness of the plates and the width of the gap can be designed such that under high overload -7-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007