The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HIROTAKA KIZUKI, NORIO HAYAFUJI and TATSUYA KIMURA ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0097 Application No. 08/513,036 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 5, 7, 17 and 18. The only other claims remaining in the application, which are claims 1-4, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 21- 26, have been allowed by the Examiner. The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for producing a semiconductor device including dry etching an A1 Ga As (0 # x # 1) layer using a HC1 gas, arsine gas, and x 1-x hydrogen supplied at the same time with a partial pressure ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007