Ex parte VAN GESTEL - Page 1



                                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                                            
                                     written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                                             
                                                                                                                             Paper No. 28                           

                                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                               
                                                                       _______________                                                                              
                                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                               
                                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                
                                                                       _______________                                                                              
                                                        Ex parte WILHELMUS J. VAN GESTEL                                                                            
                                                                        ______________                                                                              
                                                                   Appeal No. 1998-0156                                                                             
                                                                  Application 08/385,511                                                                           
                                                                       _______________                                                                              
                                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                               
                                                                       _______________                                                                              
                   Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH and LALL , Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                            
                   LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                               
                            This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-                                                
                                                                             1                                                                                      
                   3, 5-10, 13 and 14.  Claims 4, 11, and 12  have been cancelled.                                                                                  
                            The invention relates to an apparatus for recording and playing back digital audio and                                                  
                   video signals recorded on a longitudinal magnetic record carrier and slant tracks having an                                                      
                   audio signal recording sector and a video signal recording sector for containing the digital                                                     
                   audio signal and the digital video signal respectively.  For the ease of editing, the invention                                                  


                            1Claims 11 and 12 have been cancelled by Appellant by amendment filed July 7,                                                           
                   1997 (Paper No. 22½).                                                                                                                            
                                                                                   1                                                                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007