Appeal No. 1998-0235 Page 2 Application No. 08/709,764 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a toy projectile and platform assembly. A copy of claim 1 under appeal is set forth in the opinion section below. A copy of claims 4, 5 and 8 under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Uhrig 773,692 Nov. 1, 1904 Flora 847,755 Mar. 19, 1907 Fortunato 3,286,392 Nov. 22, 1966 Johnson 4,512,690 Apr. 23, 1985 Claims 1, 4, 5 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Uhrig in view of Fortunato, Johnson and Flora. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-notedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007