Appeal No. 1998-0365 Application No. 08/501,336 F.2d 1132, 1143, 227 USPQ 543, 551 (Fed. Cir. 1985). On the record before us, we find no reasonable suggestion for combining the teachings of the references relied upon by the examiner in a manner which would have reasonably led one of ordinary skill in the art to arrive at the claimed invention. Accordingly, we reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 5-6 and 9-16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Doehner in view of Barnes. REVERSED ) SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) DONALD E. ADAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007