The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MAKOTO YAMAGISHI
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0412
Application No. 08/320,935
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 5
through 9, 11 through 16 and 18 through 27.
The disclosed invention relates to an electro-acoustical
apparatus.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it
reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007