Appeal No. 1998-0412
Application No. 08/320,935
Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Miura in view of Bellafiore.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Miura in view of common equalizing practices
in the art.
Claims 12 through 15 and 25 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Bellafiore in view of Ward.
Claims 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Bellafiore in view of Ward and
Gefvert.
Claims 16, 18 through 22 and 24 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Miura in view of
Gefvert.
Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Miura in view of Gefvert and Ward.
Reference is made to the briefs and the answers for the
respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
All of the rejections are reversed.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007