Ex parte OKAMURA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0456                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/454,706                                                  





               9.  A storage capacitor power supply adapted to store                  
          electricity in a capacitor block consisting of a plurality of               
          capacitors connected in series, in parallel or in any                       
          combination of series and parallel and to supply electric                   
          power to a load, said power supply comprising a residual                    
          electricity-detecting circuit which takes the voltage                       
          developed across the power supply and, applies the voltage to               
          a series combination of a voltage regulator circuit and a                   
          detector device for detecting a current corresponding to the                
          residual electric power.                                                    

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Meinhold                4,303,877               Dec.  1, 1981               
          Barthel                 4,364,396               Dec. 21, 1982               
          Metroka et al.          5,121,288               Jun.  9, 1992               

               Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over Metroka in view of Barthel.                               
               Claims 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)               
          as being unpatentable over Metroka in view of Barthel and                   
          Meinhold.                                                                   
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and appellant regarding the above-noted                     
          rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (paper                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007