Appeal No. 1998-0529 Application No. 07/961,076 references, Wong, Ichikawa (I), and Ichikawa (II), disclose an analogous process wherein sialyl carbohydrate is produced by transferring a sialyl group to a carbohydrate from a donor molecule, e.g. cytidine monophosphate-sialic acid (CMP-sialic acid), in the presence of a sialyl transferase and wherein the donor molecule CMP-sialic acid is regenerated in situ using sialic acid, a CMP-sialic acid synthetase and the CMP from which the sialyl has been removed. (E.g., Wong, col. 5, line 66 - col. 6, line 37, and Figure 1). In order to establish a prima facie case of obviousness on the facts before us, the examiner must have provided evidence which would have led one of ordinary skill in this art, at the time of the invention, to the claimed method of producing a fucosylated carbohydrate. Even if we assume for purposes of argument that one of ordinary skill in this art would have been motivated by Wong, Ichikawa (I), and/or Ichikawa (II) to try modifying the process disclosed in Gokhale in order to regenerate the donor molecule in situ, it remains that we have not yet reached the presently claimed method. Claim 1 requires "recycling in situ the nucleoside 5'-phosphate with fucose to form the corresponding nucleoside 5'-diphospho-fucose." (Claim 1). On this record, the examiner has provided no facts or evidence which would suggest how this is to be accomplished. To the extent that the examiner would urge the substitution of fucose for the sialic acid in the secondary references, it has not been demonstrated that one of ordinary skill in this art led to this 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007