Ex parte SHIMIZU et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0542                                        Page 2           
          Application No. 08/479,843                                                   


          film is useful as a magnetic head core material                              
          (specification, page 2).  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                       
                         A soft magnetic thin film consisting                          
                    essentially of a single layer of a Fe B N                          
                                                          ab c                         
                    composition, wherein a, b and c each denote                        
                    atomic percent, provided that a + b + c = 100,                     
                    and B denotes at least one of Co, Ni and Ru, and                   
                    wherein the compositional range is given by                        
                         0 — b # 5, and                                                
                         0 — c — 5,                                                    
                    wherein said composition is substantially                          
                    uniform along the thickness of the film,                           
                    and wherein said magnetic film has a                               
                    coercivity not exceeding 2.5 Oe and a                              
                    saturation magnetic flux density B  of at                          
                                                       25                              
                    least 16 kg measured at a magnetic field of                        
                    25 Oe.                                                             

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                               
          Otomo et al. (Otomo)          4,772,976            Sep. 20, 1988             
          Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)        4,935,314           Jun. 19,             
          1990                                                                         
               Claims 1-6 and 11-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Kobayashi and optionally Otomo.                   
                                       OPINION                                         
               Upon careful consideration of the opposing arguments                    
          presented by appellants and the examiner, we find that the                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007