The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SIEGFRIED RUMP ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0675 Application No. 08/423,512 ____________ HEARD: August 16, 2001 ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-9 and 11-17. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal adapts the triggering of an automatic braking operation of a motor vehicle. The automatic braking operation produces a brake pressure higher than that corresponding to the position of aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007