Appeal No. 1998-0765
Application No. 08/451,853
Kaiser, McSweeney, Miyasaka and Brauer or Peng. Also, claims
16 to 22, and 24 to 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Uchino and Miyasaka.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants and the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for2 3
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the
examiner and the supporting arguments. We have, likewise,
reviewed the appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs.
We reverse.
In our analysis here, we are guided by the general
proposition that in an appeal involving a rejection under 35
Two reply briefs were filed as papers nos. 14 and 16. Both were2
entered into the record by the examiner.
The examiner responded to each of the reply briefs in papers nos. 153
and 17 respectively.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007