Appeal No. 1998-0765
Application No. 08/451,853
In conclusion, we have not sustained the rejection under
35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 16 to 19, 21, 23, 25, 26, 28, and 32
to 36 over Kaiser, McSweeney and Miyasaka; of claims 20, 22,
24 and 27 over Kaiser, McSweeney, Miyasaka and Brauer or Peng;
and of claims 16 to 22 and 24 to 36 over Uchino and Miyasaka.
REVERSED
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007