Appeal No. 1998-0888 Application 08/314,036 concludes that using a single anode coupled to multiple emitter planes of the Van Gorkom or Yamagishi design would achieve the desired continuous pitch quality sought by Van Gorkom and would require only a single vacuum envelope (FR3; EA7). Appellants argue that Van Gorkom and Yamagishi teach creation of a large display by combining multiple complete small displays, each emitter plate having an anode plate, and neither suggests a structure having a single anode plate and multiple emitter plates as claimed (Br7-8). Initially, we do not understand what the Examiner means by his statement (EA6) that Spindt meets all of the limitations of claim 9 except if one was to interpret the claims in light of the specification. The Examiner does not explain what term(s) need interpretation in light of the specification. It seems that the only term which can be in question is "emitter plates," and we do not see how the Examiner can reasonably read plural plates onto the single backing plate 13 with diffused regions 14 in Spindt. We agree with Appellants that none of the references suggests a display having a single anode plate and multiple - 9 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007