Ex parte HORIGUCHI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-1111                                                        
          Application 08/539,513                                                      


          input function in the computer for retrieving all input data                
          into the memory of the computer prior to performing the data                
          processing function;                                                        
               performing the data processing function on the input data              
          in the memory of the computer after receiving control from the              
          input fuction when it has completed, wherein the performing                 
          step further comprises the steps of generating output data and              
          storing the output data in the memory of the computer;                      
               the data processing function transferring control to an                
          output function in the computer for retrieving all of the                   
          output data from the memory of the computer and storing the                 
          output data prior to terminating the data processing function;              
          and                                                                         
               terminating the data processing function after receiving               
          control from the output function when it has completed.                     
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Ferguson                 5,121,493                Jun.  9, 1992             
          Ferguson et al.          5,274,805                Dec. 28, 1993             
               Claims 1-3 and 5-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102               
          as being anticipated by Ferguson.  Claims 4 stands rejected                 
          under  35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ferguson in               
          view of Ferguson et al.                                                     
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                  
          Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for                 
          the details thereof.                                                        
                                       OPINION                                        
               We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-15               

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007