Appeal No. 1998-1125 Page 13
Application No. 08/410,247
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-8 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being indefinite for
failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
subject matter which applicant regards as the invention and to
reject claims 1-6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Smits I is reversed. The decision of the examiner to
reject claims 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as
anticipated by Smits II and to reject claims 1-6 and 8 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Smits II is
affirmed.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007