Appeal No. 1998-1146 Page 11 Application No. 08/410,177 have been maintained by the examiner. On this record, we shall sustain the stated § 102 rejections. CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4-6 and 8-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicants regard as the invention is reversed. The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 5 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Comelli and to reject claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Inglese is affirmed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007