The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MADHU ANAND, SHIVAJI SIRCAR
and BRIAN T. CARVILL
__________
Appeal No. 1998-1219
Application 08/419,317
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WALTZ, LIEBERMAN and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 22, which are
the only claims in this application (see the Brief, page 3).
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
process for operating equilibrium controlled reactions under
isothermal conditions including the steps of countercurrently
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007