Ex parte CHRISTIE - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                             
            The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written for publication and     
            is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                       
                                                                                 Paper No. 16            
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                         __________________                                              
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                         __________________                                              
                                      Ex parte SCOTT CHRISTIE                                            
                                         __________________                                              
                                        Appeal No. 1998-1257                                             
                                      Application 08/337,0951                                            
                                          ________________                                               
                                               ON BRIEF                                                  
                                          ________________                                               
            Before SCHAFER, LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                  This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                                
            the examiner’s rejection of appellant’s claims 7-26.  No claim                               
            has been allowed.  Claims 1-6 have been canceled.  The real                                  
            party in interest is Audiovox Corporation.                                                   
                              References relied on by the Examiner                                       
            Tomoda et al. (Tomoda)                     4,763,121                Aug.  9,                 
            1988                                                                                         
            Kurozu et al. (Kurozu)                     5,157,389                Oct. 20,                 

                  1 Application for patent filed November 10, 1994.                                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007