Ex parte CHRISTIE - Page 4




            Appeal No. 1998-1257                                                                         
            Application 08/337,095                                                                       

            security status of the security system throughout a second                                   
            range which is greater than the first range.                                                 
                  21.  A control unit for controlling a security system                                  
            having an audible actuation indicator, the control unit                                      
            comprising:                                                                                  
                  a transmitter for transmitting signals to the security                                 
            system for controlling a disarming/arming operation of the                                   
            security system and for actuating the audible actuation                                      
            indicator to generate a sound; and                                                           
                  an actuator for actuating the transmitter to transmit the                              
            signals to the security system, the actuator being adapted to                                
            selectively prevent the audible actuation indicator from                                     
            sounding.                                                                                    
                                                Opinion                                                  
                  We reverse the rejection of claims 7-20 and affirm the                                 
            rejection of claims 21-26.                                                                   
            A.    The rejection of claims 7-20                                                           
                  A reversal of any rejection on appeal should not be                                    
            construed as an affirmative indication that the appellant's                                  
            claims are patentable over prior art.  We address only the                                   
            sufficiency of the findings and rationale as set forth by the                                
            examiner and on which the examiner’s rejection is based.                                     
                  Claims 7-20 require the transmission of a first signal                                 
            which changes the security status of the vehicle security                                    
            system and a second signal which does not change the status of                               
            the vehicle security system.  Also, the claims require that                                  

                                                   4                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007