The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS ALBERTSEN, RAKESH ANAND,
MARY CARLSON, JOANNA GRODEN,
PHILIP J. HENDGE, GEOFF JOSLYN,
KENNETH KINZLER, ALEXANDER F. MARKHAM,
YUSUKE NAKAMURA, ANDREW THLIVERIS,
BERT VOGELSTEIN, and RAYMOND L. WHITE
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1283
Application No. 08/449,731
____________
HEARD: March 8, 2001
____________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 19, 20, 52, 53, and 64, which are all of the claims pending in the
application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007