Appeal No. 1998-1339 Application 08/024,305 invention is material and must be accounted for by the examiner in a rejection based on prior art. For all of the foregoing reasons, we reverse the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8-17. Conclusion The rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 8-17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gharavi is reversed. REVERSED JAMESON LEE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT SALLY GARDNER-LANE ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) SALLY C. MEDLEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20037-3202 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007