The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DENNIS L. VENABLE, MICHAEL R. CAMPANELLI, WILLIAM A.
FUSS, JAMES E. BOLLMAN, TAKASHI NAGAO, TOSHIYA YAMADA,
and KAZUYA YAMADA
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1389
Application No. 08/553,2321
____________
HEARD: May 15, 2000
____________
Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 30-53, which are all
of the claims pending in this application.
1Continuation of S.N. 08/133,422, filed October 10, 1993; now U.S.
Patent No. 5,485,568.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007