Appeall No. 1998-1398 Page 25
Application No. 08/400,637
Because the Gillig references use several transmitters
and receivers to originate and receive calls in cordless and
cellular telephone systems, we are persuaded that teachings
from the prior art would have suggested the limitations of "a
transceiver, ... originating and receiving cellular calls,
using the transceiver ...; originating and receiving cordless
calls, using the transceiver ...."
Second, the appellants make the following argument.
[T]he preferred embodiment of the priority document
does not teach or suggest the step of "automatically
generating a three way call between the telephone
device having the telephone number, the cellular
cordless telephone having the cellular telephone
number and the telephone landline having the
landline telephone number responsive to the step of
detecting," as claimed in claim 27 ....
(Appeal Br. at 15.) Claims 27-29 each specify in pertinent
part the following limitations:
detecting movement of the cellular cordless
telephone between the cellular telephone system and
the cordless telephone system; and
automatically generating a three way call
between the telephone device having the telephone
number, the cellular cordless telephone having the
cellular telephone number and the telephone landline
having the landline telephone number responsive to
the step of detecting.
Page: Previous 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007