Appeall No. 1998-1398 Page 30
Application No. 08/400,637
between the calling party and a telephone landline when the
cellular cordless telephone is located in a cellular telephone
system. Because the Gillig references fail to disclose
terminating a path of a three way call, we are not persuaded
that the teachings from the prior art would appear to have
suggested the limitations of "automatically terminating a path
of the three way call between the telephone device having the
telephone number and the cellular cordless telephone having
the cellular telephone number when the cellular cordless
telephone is located in the cordless telephone system" and
"automatically terminating a path of the three way call
between the telephone device having the telephone phone number
and the telephone landline having the landline telephone
number when the cellular cordless telephone is located in the
cellular telephone system." Therefore, we reverse the
rejection of claim 28 as obvious over Gillig ‘230,
Gillig ‘042, Gillig ‘558, or Gillig ‘674.
We end by noting that our affirmances are based only on
the arguments made in the brief. Arguments not made therein
are neither before us nor at issue but are considered waived.
Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007