The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte RONALD H. NELSON, DIMITRIJE MILOVICH, WESTON M. WILCOX, and ROBERT F. READ _____________ Appeal No. 1998-1537 Application No. 08/134,916 ______________ HEARD: SEPTEMBER 12, 2000 _______________ Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 6, 21, 27 to 29, 32 to 36, 38 to 44 and 46, all the claims remaining in the application. The claims on appeal are drawn to a vehicle frame (claims 1 to 6, 21, 27 to 29, 36, 38 to 41 and 44), a lug for joiningPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007