Appeal No. 1998-1625
Application 08/306,517
For the above reasons, we find that the examiner has not
established a prima facie case of inadequate written
description of the invention recited in any of the appellants’
claims. Accordingly, we reverse the examiner’s rejection.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 6, 7, 9 and 11-13 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, written description requirement, is
reversed.
REVERSED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-6-6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007