Ex parte NAKABAYASHI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1718                                                        
          Application No. 08/479,862                                                  


               13.  A process for producing an electrophotographic                    
          photoreceptor comprising the steps of:                                      
               removing part of or all oxidants from an air                           
          atmosphere to form a treated air atmosphere; and                            
               preparing a coating solution capable of forming a                      
          light-sensitive layer on an electroconductive base;                         
               coating said coating solution on an                                    
          electroconductive base; and                                                 
               drying said coating to form a light-sensitive layer;                   

          wherein said step of coating is performed in said treated air               
          atmosphere.                                                                 
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Mimura et al. (Mimura)           4,492,745          Jan.  8, 1985           
          Herron et al. (Herron)           5,238,607          Aug. 24, 1993           
               Appealed claims 16, 18, 19 and 21 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.  Claims 13-19, 21, 23 and                
          25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                         
          anticipated by Mimura.  In addition, claims 13, 14 and 22                   
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated                
          by Herron while claims 17 and 23-26 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 102(e) or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Herron.                                    


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007