Ex Parte DORST et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                     
                               publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                                                                                   Paper No. 35                       
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                  _____________                                                       
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  _____________                                                       
                              Ex parte LEENDERT DORST and KAREN I. TROVATO                                            
                                                  _____________                                                       
                                               Appeal No. 1998-1733                                                   
                                             Application No. 07/617,303                                               
                                                 ______________                                                       
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                 _______________                                                      
             Before THOMAS, KRASS and BARRY,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
             KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                    This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-15, 17-23 and 33.               
             Claims 24-26 and 29-32 have been indicated by the examiner to be directed to                             
             allowable subject matter and are not before us on appeal.                                                
                    The invention is directed to a method and apparatus for planning a path with                      
             regard to moving objects.  The invention is embodied in software for creating, in a                      




             computer memory, a configuration space data structure representing a physical task                       
                                                          1                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007