Ex parte DEILY et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 10         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                      Ex parte MICHAEL DEILY and NORMAN CRANDALL                      
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1824                                 
                              Application No. 08/463,383                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN,               
          and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 16                
          and 17.  These claims constitute all of the claims remaining                
          in the application.                                                         


               Appellants’ disclosed invention pertains to a method for               
          manufacturing a neck flange.  A basic understanding of the                  
          invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 16,              


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007